🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump has once again threatened to use the Insurrection Law, legislation that allows the US president to send armed forces on domestic territory. This move is seen as a strategy to control the mobilization of the state guard as judicial bodies and governors in cities under Democratic control continue to stymie his attempts.

Is this permissible, and what are the implications? Below is key information about this long-standing statute.

What is the Insurrection Act?

The Insurrection Act is a federal legislation that gives the US president the power to send the armed forces or federalize state guard forces inside the US to quell internal rebellions.

The law is often called the Insurrection Act of 1807, the year when Thomas Jefferson signed it into law. Yet, the current Insurrection Act is a blend of laws enacted between over several decades that define the duties of American troops in civilian policing.

Usually, the armed forces are not allowed from carrying out police functions against American citizens unless during times of emergency.

This statute permits military personnel to engage in internal policing duties such as arresting individuals and performing searches, functions they are typically restricted from engaging in.

A professor stated that national guard troops cannot legally engage in ordinary law enforcement activities without the president first invokes the act, which authorizes the deployment of troops within the country in the instance of an insurrection or rebellion.

Such an action raises the risk that troops could employ lethal means while performing protective duties. Additionally, it could serve as a forerunner to other, more aggressive force deployments in the coming days.

“No action these forces will be allowed to do that, like other officers against whom these protests have been directed on their own,” the commentator stated.

When has the Insurrection Act been used?

The act has been deployed on numerous times. It and related laws were employed during the civil rights movement in the sixties to protect protesters and learners ending school segregation. Eisenhower dispatched the 101st airborne to Little Rock, Arkansas to guard students of color integrating Central High after the state governor activated the national guard to keep the students out.

Since the civil rights movement, yet, its deployment has become very uncommon, according to a study by the Congressional Research.

President Bush invoked the law to respond to violence in LA in 1992 after law enforcement filmed beating the African American driver King were cleared, leading to lethal violence. The governor had sought military aid from the president to quell the violence.

What’s Trump’s track record with the Insurrection Act?

The former president warned to invoke the act in the summer when the state’s leader challenged Trump to prevent the deployment of troops to support immigration authorities in Los Angeles, labeling it an “illegal deployment”.

During 2020, the president requested leaders of various states to mobilize their state forces to DC to quell protests that broke out after George Floyd was died by a Minneapolis police officer. A number of the executives complied, deploying units to the capital district.

Then, the president also suggested to invoke the statute for demonstrations after the incident but never actually did so.

During his campaign for his next term, he implied that things would be different. He told an audience in the location in recently that he had been blocked from deploying troops to control unrest in urban areas during his previous administration, and stated that if the situation occurred again in his future term, “I’m not waiting.”

He has also promised to utilize the National Guard to help carry out his immigration objectives.

Trump remarked on this week that up to now it had not been required to deploy the statute but that he would think about it.

“We have an Act of Insurrection for a reason,” the former president commented. “Should fatalities occurred and legal obstacles arose, or state or local leaders were impeding progress, sure, I’d do that.”

Why is the Insurrection Act so controversial?

There exists a deep historical practice of maintaining the US armed forces out of public life.

The framers, having witnessed overreach by the colonial troops during the revolution, feared that providing the commander-in-chief total authority over armed units would erode individual rights and the democratic process. Under the constitution, state leaders typically have the power to keep peace within state territories.

These ideals are expressed in the 1878 statute, an historic legislation that typically prohibited the armed forces from engaging in police duties. This act functions as a statutory exception to the Posse Comitatus Act.

Civil rights groups have repeatedly advised that the law gives the president sweeping powers to deploy troops as a internal security unit in ways the founders did not intend.

Court Authority Over the Insurrection Act

Judges have been hesitant to second-guess a commander-in-chief’s decisions, and the federal appeals court recently said that the commander’s action to send in the military is entitled to a “great level of deference”.

However